In the last 30 years, the global luxury market has shifted dramatically. What was once the domain of the ultra-wealthy has steadily opened its doors to the aspirational middle class. Labels such as Louis Vuitton, Gucci, and Rolex—once exclusive symbols of old money—have become increasingly visible in the wardrobes of working professionals, freelancers, and digital influencers alike.
According to a media report, investor and market commentator Abhijit Chokshi shed light on this evolving trend. He noted that in 1995, a Louis Vuitton handbag priced at Rs 40,000 was a marker of generational wealth, typically owned only by India’s elite, old-money families. However, by 2025, the same brand offers handbags priced around Rs 2.8 lakh, now purchased by salaried professionals in their 30s—many of whom opt to finance these luxury items through EMI schemes.
This dramatic shift isn’t because luxury became more affordable. It’s because aspirational marketing weaponised middle-class ambition.
“75% of all luxury spending comes from the middle class. In 1995, Louis Vuitton sold a ₹40,000 handbag to only an elite, old-money audience. In 2025, they sell ₹2.8 lakh handbags to salaried 30-year-olds, financing it over EMIs. What changed? Luxury didn’t become cheaper, The middle class became addicted to looking rich,” Chokshi noted.
According to market estimates, 75% of all luxury spending today comes from the middle class, not from the super-rich. This shift isn’t about luxury becoming more affordable. It’s about the growing cultural pressure to appear affluent.
Driven by aspirational marketing and amplified by social media visibility, luxury brands have reinvented themselves—not as symbols of comfort or heritage, but as immediate badges of status and envy. In today’s Instagram-driven world, where the appearance of wealth often outweighs actual financial standing, luxury consumption has shifted towards seeking admiration rather than security.
This shift has created a booming market fueled not by true riches, but by aspiration, image, and the psychology of seeming wealthy. Abhijit Chokshi pointed out that the luxury sector did not target mere affluence; it targeted aspiration and insecurity, leveraging psychological tactics such as scarcity, status appeal, and zero-interest EMIs. The outcome? High-priced items like handbags and belts costing Rs 1.5 lakh have become impulsive purchases, frequently made on credit.
However, this shift comes with significant consequences. Today, 67% of luxury purchases are made using borrowed money, giving rise to what psychologists term the “Luxury Illusion Curve” — a cycle of emotions that swings from confidence to anxiety and eventually regret. For many buyers, this is less about building wealth and more about accumulating status debt.
Abhijit Chokshi concluded by saying, “Every EMI spent on a logo becomes money not invested, not compounding, and not building real freedom. It’s not judgment it’s a reality check: the price of pretending is often paid in missed opportunity.”