The Live Ahmedabad
  • Home
  • Ahd City
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Featured

The Live Ahmedabad

  • Home
  • Ahd City
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Featured
Nation

Top court rejects 30% cap on credit card interest

by TLAteam December 21, 2024December 21, 2024
written by TLAteam December 21, 2024December 21, 2024
Top court rejects 30% cap on credit card interest

The Supreme Court on Friday reversed a 2008 ruling by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) that barred banks from charging more than 30% annual interest on overdue credit card payments, allowing banks to determine their own rates within existing regulations.

Business News

A bench of justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma set aside the NCDRC’s decision, which had declared such high rates to be an unfair trade practice. The apex court’s ruling came in response to appeals by multiple banks, including Standard Chartered Bank, Citibank, and HSBC, contesting the NCDRC’s cap on credit card interest rates.

“In view of foregoing reasons, the judgment of the NCDRC is set aside and appeals are allowed,” said justice Trivedi while delivering the verdict. A detailed copy of the judgement was awaited till the time of going to print.

The impugned NCRDRC order was stayed by the Supreme Court on February 3, 2009.

Most credit card companies in India charge somewhere between 22-49% in annual interest rates at present.

The case originated from a petition filed by Awaz Foundation, an NGO, which questioned whether charging interest rates between 36% and 49% per annum on credit card dues amounted to exploitative or usurious practices.

The NCDRC, in its 2008 decision, labelled such rates as excessive and noted that they disproportionately burdened consumers, particularly those already in financial distress.

The NCDRC had also criticised the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for its lack of regulatory intervention, arguing that the central bank’s failure to define a “usurious” interest rate had allowed financial institutions to exploit borrowers. The commission emphasised that penal interest should not be capitalized and accused banks of using compounding practices to inflate dues further.

In support of its stance, the NCDRC compared global credit card interest rates, noting significantly lower rates in developed economies like the United States and the United Kingdom, where rates ranged from 9.99% to 17.99%.

The commission maintained that India had no justification for adopting the higher rates prevalent in smaller, emerging economies and called for moderation aligned with developed markets.

The RBI, however, maintained that it does not regulate specific interest rates charged by banks, instead leaving such decisions to the discretion of individual banks’ boards of directors under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. While the central bank has directed financial institutions not to charge “excessive” interest rates, it refrains from setting strict caps.

Banks, in their defence, argued that capping interest rates would undermine their profitability and affect credit availability. They claimed that high interest rates offset the risks of default and the costs associated with providing services like customer assistance and free alerts. Additionally, they contended that the NCDRC lacked jurisdiction to regulate their operations, particularly in matters of interest rates, which fall under RBI’s purview. Some of the banks were represented by senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Dhruv Mehta.

In overturning the NCDRC ruling, the Supreme Court supported the banks’ position that interest rates are governed by market dynamics and regulatory oversight by the RBI, not by consumer fora. It acknowledged the complexities of managing credit card facilities and the need for institutions to mitigate risks through higher interest rates, according to lawyers associated with the matter.

0 comment
previous post
Morbi man caught in Ahmedabad with drugs worth ₹3.60 crore
next post
Arrest warrant issued against former cricketer Robin Uthappa for alleged Rs 23 lakh Provident Fund fraud

You may also like

80 private schools received bomb threats

July 18, 2025

Google Offers ₹19,500 Gemini Pro AI Plan Free...

July 17, 2025

PUBG World Cup 2025: 24 Teams, ₹25.5 Cr...

July 17, 2025

Praggnanandhaa Crushes Carlsen in 39 Moves at Freestyle...

July 17, 2025

Income Tax Crackdown Forces 40,000 to Withdraw Bogus...

July 17, 2025

IndiGo Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Mumbai After...

July 17, 2025

Govt Fixes Prices for 71 Medicines Under DPCO,...

July 16, 2025

Indian Cities Rise in QS 2026 Rankings; Delhi...

July 16, 2025

Health Ministry Denies Warning Labels on Street Food,...

July 16, 2025

Mumbai Rains: IndiGo Issues Advisory Amid Flight Delays...

July 15, 2025

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Business News

Recent Posts

  • 80 private schools received bomb threats

    July 18, 2025
  • Ahmedabad girl missing for six years found by Khambhat anti-human trafficking team

    July 18, 2025
  • Ahmedabad to enjoy a weekend full of poetry, movies, comedy, and exhibitions

    July 18, 2025
  • Is Ahmedabad really the ‘Cleanest Big City’? Heritage sites still remain dirty

    July 18, 2025
  • AMC’s 10-year security bill: ₹244 crore for guards and bouncers

    July 18, 2025
December 2024
MTWTFSS
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 
« Nov Jan »
The Live Ahmedabad
Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Ahd City
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Featured
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise with Us
  • Work With Us
  • Contact Us

© 2021 - The Live Ahmedabad. All Rights Reserved.